A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon through the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal guidance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed into the court in which the case has become or will be filed.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then technique the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 times for your department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're guided by the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The case addresses A selection of issues which includes, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation from the right to life.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are of your view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion could be deemed, however, we're obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, topic to availability of vacancy matter to the approval in the competent authority. Read more
Upholding Justice: The application of the legislation as well as the subsequent punishment of the guilty party give a perception of closure and justice for the victim’s family and loved kinds.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as a foster child. Although the couple had two young children of their have at home, the social worker didn't tell them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple had young children.
I) The above referred case FIR, for that murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who's father with the petitioner and According to Tale of FIR, the petitioner is definitely an eyewkness with the occurrence.
The scrupulous reader may perhaps have noticed something above: a flaw. Past the first seven words, the definition focuses on the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two fundamental elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to some person, by carrying out an act which while in the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently risky that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death on the this kind of person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 check here (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay out fixation are not entertainable for that reasons that these matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and also the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient therefore this petition is dismissed, which entails disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is not in the position to dilate upon such disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--